|
Hypersyllogistic Forums: Eeek... Old games - Hypersyllogistic Forums
Jump to content
Eeek... Old games
Rate Topic:
   
Jason Vines

- Administrator
-
-
Group:
Forum Overlord
-
Posts:
1,059
-
Joined:
08-June 05
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Washington, D.C.
-
Interests:Reading, writing, philosophy, history, computer games, genre fiction, web programming
-
Affiliation:Libertarian
-
Religion:None
Posted 16 January 2006 - 09:16 PM
For Christmas, I got a new computer, so I've been playing the newest games I hadn't been able to before: Call of Duty 2, Doom 3, Quake 4, Day of Defeat: Source, etc. Unfortunately, because of logistics, I couldn't take my new computer back to university with me when the winter break ended. Looking for a silver lining, I thought I'd still be able to play and enjoy my old games.
Perhaps I was mistaken.
I was just trying to play the old version of Day of Defeat (with the first Half-Life engine), and the graphics horrified me! I felt almost as if I were looking at an old Nintendo game. And then I tried to punch someone, as I do in Day of Defeat: Source, and I couldn't.  My most surprising and handy attack (in a gunfight, you don't expect someone to wallop on you with fists) is nowhere to be found.
I've had a similar experience before. I used to play Elite Force a lot, but I loaded it up recently, and the blocky graphics shocked me. I couldn't keep playing after the first training level; I couldn't take what I saw seriously.
Does anyone else have this problem, where old games are like nails on a chalkboard?
Perhaps the oldest games I can stand now are the more refined Quake 3 engine adaptations, such as the Jedi Knight games. And, for some strange reason, No One Lives Forever... maybe because of its incredible gameplay.
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." -V for Vendetta
"Don't tell me what I can't do!" -John Locke, Lost
Visit me on the web: Hypersyllogistic | Flickr | Twitter

0
Bondo

- Captain
-
-
Group:
Members
-
Posts:
1,142
-
Joined:
31-December 05
-
Gender:Male
-
Affiliation:Libertarian
-
Religion:Not Indicated
Posted 16 January 2006 - 11:37 PM
Perhaps my favorite game of all time is the original (arcade perfect) Rampage with the wolfman. So I'm a fan of less sophisticated graphics.
For today's graphics, its less important to me that the game look good, and more important that it has a great visual style. I'd be more than happy to sacrifice the technical side of of the visual look for the sake of the artistic appeal.
But, I do notice a lower tolerance for poor 3D graphics in particular. Poor Duke Nukem. What awful, awful stuff. I can't even play that anymore. And another great, old game -- Conquest of the New World (iirc) is so pixelated I can't even look at it: and I bought that game years after it came out.
Old console or 2d games, I don't mind much unless they are really bad. I still think my SNES Shadowrun looks great, and that is even considering that I was stuck in a room for 1-2 months when I first played it because the graphics obscured the door controls.
Playing the original starfox, on the other hand, is a different matter entirely.
0
Sim

- Captain
-
-
Group:
Forum Deputies
-
Posts:
1,411
-
Joined:
05-September 05
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Berlin, Germany
-
Affiliation:Green
-
Religion:None
Posted 18 January 2006 - 10:14 AM
I'm not so picky when it comes to computer graphics. Sure, I wouldn't really enjoy playing Doom1 anymore. But I still love to play Civilization II, and even after playing games like Half-Life2, Quake4 and FEAR, which have rather amazing graphics, I still enjoy playing Max Payne 1 or Deus Ex. Sure, great graphics add a lot to the fun ... but some games are just great, despite old graphics.
"In earlier religions the spirit of the time was expressed through the individual and confirmed by miracles. In modern religions the spirit is expressed through the many and confirmed by reason."
"Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings."
- Heinrich Heine (1797-1856)
0
Cymro

- Commander
-
-
Group:
Members
-
Posts:
675
-
Joined:
17-December 05
-
Gender:Female
-
Location:North West/South East Wales, UK
-
Interests:Music, Computer Art, and (I know it's a cliche but) beer.
-
Affiliation:Lib. Democrat (UK)
-
Religion:None
Posted 20 January 2006 - 07:52 PM
I think it's more to do with the FPS genre. I played Elite Force 2 and Half Life 2 before the originals, and I found the orignals rather dissapointing when I finally did play them. The reason I'm blaming it on the genre is that I just re-played the "Star Trek: 25th Anniversary" game last month, a 2D low res aventure/puzzle game that was released in 1992, and I loved it. The month before that I played "Top Gun: Fire at Will", a flight sim which is from the last generation DOS titles from the mid 90s, and I play most of my old RTS games (starting with the original C&C) at least once a year.
0
-Oz-

- Lieutenant
-
-
Group:
Members
-
Posts:
119
-
Joined:
01-December 05
-
Location:Columbia, SC
-
Affiliation:Not Indicated
-
Religion:None
Posted 22 January 2006 - 08:58 AM
I will rant and rave against graphics over quality until I die. So it should come to no surprise that I love old video games! My two favorite games of all time are still NES/SNES games: Ninja Gaiden III and Chrono Trigger.
Think for yourself.
Question authority.
Throughout human history, as our species has faced the frightening, terrorizing fact that we do not know who we are, or where we are going in this ocean of chaos; it has been the authorities- the political, the religious, the educational authorities- who attempt to comfort us by giving us order, rules, regulations. Informing, forming in our minds their view of reality. To think for yourself you must question authority and learn how to put yourself in a state of vulnerable, open-mindedness; chaotic, confused, vulnerability to inform yourself.
Think for yourself.
Question authority.
0
Share this topic:
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

|
|