Hypersyllogistic Forums: Why does the American media focus only on domestic grosses? - Hypersyllogistic Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked
  • Share

Why does the American media focus only on domestic grosses? Rate Topic: ***** 1 Votes

#1

User is offline   Jason Vines 

  • Administrator
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Forum Overlord
  • Posts: 1,059
  • Joined: 08-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington, D.C.
  • Interests:Reading, writing, philosophy, history, computer games, genre fiction, web programming
  • Affiliation:Libertarian
  • Religion:None
Reputation: -29
Bad


Posted 09 May 2006 - 10:09 PM

The entertainment media of the United States judge the performances of movies by how much money they earn domestically. They pay no attention to international grosses. But, today, movies have become so expensive they cannot turn large profits from domestic intake alone. They must achieve overseas success in order for studios to get returns on their investments. As one of my own professors, Dr. Harvey Feigenbaum, says in "Hollywood: The Bottom Line" (which originally appeared in the French periodical Le Monde):

Dr. Harvey Feigenbaum said:

In the late 1980s the industry was forced to internationalise. Hollywood moved from the industrial cluster model to geographical dispersion, which came to dominate during the era of liberal globalisation. The decline of the studio system accelerated this. With television enjoying a monopoly of everyday entertainment, cinema attendance became a special, and rarer, event. The costs of production and marketing reached levels where the failure of a single film could bankrupt a studio, and currently only one film in 10 is a commercial success. Risk is now the defining characteristic of the industry. By the end of the 1990s flexible specialisation was no longer enough. Costs of films were so high that even success on the domestic US market was not enough to assure profitability. International sales, which once had been merely extra revenue, became crucial to the financial success of a movie.

(Emphasis mine.)

Because movies cannot become successes without international markets, for the American media to natter incessantly about domestic totals is both myopic and misleading. It takes Americans' conviction they are the only ones who matter to obscenely inaccurate and ridiculous levels.

American entertainment reporters need to extract their heads from their posteriors and start caring about what people outside their own country think of films.
Signature Seperator image

"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." -V for Vendetta

"Don't tell me what I can't do!" -John Locke, Lost

Visit me on the web: Hypersyllogistic | Flickr | Twitter

Posted Image
0

#2

User is offline   Rorschach 

  • Lieutenant, J.G.
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 20-September 05
  • Affiliation:Not Indicated
  • Religion:Not Indicated
Reputation: 0
Neutral


Posted 10 May 2006 - 10:37 AM

Why does the BBC always give monetary amounts in "Dollars American", no matter what part of the world it involves?
Signature Seperator image

"The Germans are known for two things, driving tanks over piles of skulls, and bizarre sexual fetishes."
0

#3

User is offline   Cymro 

  • Commander
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 675
  • Joined: 17-December 05
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:North West/South East Wales, UK
  • Interests:Music, Computer Art, and (I know it's a cliche but) beer.
  • Affiliation:Lib. Democrat (UK)
  • Religion:None
Reputation: -8
Neutral


Posted 10 May 2006 - 10:56 AM

Actually it gives them in GBP too, especially here, unless you're catching some sort of different feed to what we Brits get. The only regular exception being crude oil which is always $/barrel
Signature Seperator image

Posted Image
0



Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked
  • Share

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users